Mexican American Indian vs Subsaharan African Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
Subsaharan African
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Mexican American Indians
Sub-Saharan Africans
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian vs Subsaharan African Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,517,841 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.170 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,846,771 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.307 and weighted average of 6.4%, a difference of 2.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mexican American Indian | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 0.46% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 19.4% | 27.3% |
| Range | 18.9% | 25.7% |
| Mean | 7.6% | 8.3% |
| Median | 6.8% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 4.9% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (6.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (6.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Hispanic or Latino (6.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Dutch (6.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Germany (6.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Slavs | 5.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Cubans | 4.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Portuguese | 4.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 3.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Mexicans | 3.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Panamanians | 3.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 2.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Dutch | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Haitians | 1.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Senegalese | 1.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 6.4% |