Yuman vs Cherokee Disability
COMPARE
Yuman
Cherokee
Disability
Disability Comparison
Yuman
Cherokee
14.6%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.8%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yuman vs Cherokee Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,663,643 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yuman and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 14.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,590,600 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.079 and weighted average of 14.8%, a difference of 1.5%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yuman | Cherokee |
| Minimum | 3.6% | 0.80% |
| Maximum | 37.0% | 53.3% |
| Range | 33.4% | 52.5% |
| Mean | 18.4% | 21.5% |
| Median | 18.4% | 21.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.4% | 24.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.8% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Yuman and Cherokee by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Cajun (14.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Tohono O'odham (14.8%, a difference of 1.0%), Pueblo (14.4%, a difference of 1.2%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and Seminole (14.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Seminole (14.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Dutch West Indian (14.9%, a difference of 0.39%), Tohono O'odham (14.8%, a difference of 0.51%), Cajun (14.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 2.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.1% |