Yuman vs Cajun Disability
COMPARE
Yuman
Cajun
Disability
Disability Comparison
Yuman
Cajuns
14.6%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.6%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yuman vs Cajun Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,663,643 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yuman and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 14.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,702,868 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.466 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 0.12%.

Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yuman | Cajun |
Minimum | 3.6% | 9.6% |
Maximum | 37.0% | 35.2% |
Range | 33.4% | 25.5% |
Mean | 18.4% | 17.8% |
Median | 18.4% | 16.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 14.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.4% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.8% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Yuman and Cajuns by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Tohono O'odham (14.8%, a difference of 1.0%), Pueblo (14.4%, a difference of 1.2%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 1.2%), Cherokee (14.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and Seminole (14.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Pueblo (14.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Tohono O'odham (14.8%, a difference of 1.2%), Cherokee (14.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and Seminole (14.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 14.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 14.1% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 14.2% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 14.2% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.2% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 14.9% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 14.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.6% |