Soviet Union vs Alaskan Athabascan Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Alaskan Athabascan
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Soviet Union
Alaskan Athabascans
2.5%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
22.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
192nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.5%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
10.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Alaskan Athabascan Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,492,822 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006 and weighted average of 2.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,796,895 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.167 and weighted average of 2.5%, a difference of 1.1%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Soviet Union | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 0.32% | 0.38% |
| Maximum | 5.8% | 15.1% |
| Range | 5.5% | 14.7% |
| Mean | 2.4% | 3.8% |
| Median | 2.4% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union and Alaskan Athabascans by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Moroccan (2.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Ukrainian (2.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Sioux (2.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Germany (2.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (2.5%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are French (2.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Russia (2.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Bahamas (2.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Central American (2.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (2.5%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 28.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 2.5% |
| Sioux | 24.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 2.5% |
| Moroccans | 22.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 2.5% |
| Soviet Union | 22.2 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.5% |
| Ukrainians | 21.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 17.9 /100 | #194 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 15.6 /100 | #195 | Poor 2.5% |
| Koreans | 15.5 /100 | #196 | Poor 2.5% |
| Crow | 15.2 /100 | #197 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 15.0 /100 | #198 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 14.7 /100 | #199 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 13.3 /100 | #200 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 12.9 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.5% |
| Slovaks | 12.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 12.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 11.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 11.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.5% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 10.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.5% |
| French | 9.9 /100 | #207 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Central Americans | 8.7 /100 | #208 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Malaysians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 2.5% |