Central American vs Alaskan Athabascan Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Central American
Alaskan Athabascan
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Central Americans
Alaskan Athabascans
2.5%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
8.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.5%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
10.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American vs Alaskan Athabascan Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 503,524,295 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.436 and weighted average of 2.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,796,895 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.167 and weighted average of 2.5%, a difference of 0.23%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 0.52% | 0.38% |
| Maximum | 4.3% | 15.1% |
| Range | 3.8% | 14.7% |
| Mean | 2.2% | 3.8% |
| Median | 2.4% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.81% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.74% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.73% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans and Alaskan Athabascans by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Malaysian (2.5%, a difference of 0.15%), French (2.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Russia (2.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Panamanian (2.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (2.5%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are French (2.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Russia (2.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Bahamas (2.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and Slovak (2.5%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Crow | 15.2 /100 | #197 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 15.0 /100 | #198 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 14.7 /100 | #199 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 13.3 /100 | #200 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 12.9 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.5% |
| Slovaks | 12.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 12.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 11.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 11.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.5% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 10.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.5% |
| French | 9.9 /100 | #207 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Central Americans | 8.7 /100 | #208 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Malaysians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Panamanians | 6.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 5.1 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Samoans | 5.1 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Ecuadorians | 4.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 4.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 4.4 /100 | #216 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Celtics | 4.4 /100 | #217 | Tragic 2.6% |