Slavic vs Immigrants from Western Europe Vision Disability
COMPARE
Slavic
Immigrants from Western Europe
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Slavs
Immigrants from Western Europe
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
46.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
177th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
41.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
181st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Immigrants from Western Europe Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,742,725 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.260 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,396,041 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Europe and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.922 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 0.31%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slavic | Immigrants from Western Europe |
| Minimum | 0.34% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 14.1% | 75.4% |
| Range | 13.7% | 74.2% |
| Mean | 2.9% | 7.0% |
| Median | 2.3% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 13.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 13.5% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs and Immigrants from Western Europe by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Yugoslavian (2.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Oceania (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from North America (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Fiji (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Uruguayan (2.2%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Europe are Costa Rican (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Uruguayan (2.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from North America (2.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Oceania (2.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% |
| Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
| Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
| Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% |
| Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% |
| Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |
| Moroccans | 35.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 33.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 2.2% |
| Native Hawaiians | 33.3 /100 | #186 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 30.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 2.2% |
| Guyanese | 28.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 2.2% |
| Salvadorans | 27.4 /100 | #189 | Fair 2.2% |