Slavic vs Choctaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Slavic
Choctaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Slavs
Choctaw
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
46.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
177th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Choctaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,742,725 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.260 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,580,756 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 3.3%, a difference of 51.8%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slavic | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 0.34% | 0.24% |
| Maximum | 14.1% | 15.8% |
| Range | 13.7% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 2.9% | 6.0% |
| Median | 2.3% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 2.6% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Yugoslavian (2.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Oceania (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from North America (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Fiji (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Uruguayan (2.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
| Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
| Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% |
| Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% |
| Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |
| Moroccans | 35.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Pima (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Pueblo (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Lumbee (3.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and Creek (3.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |