Slavic vs Immigrants from El Salvador Vision Disability
COMPARE
Slavic
 Immigrants from El Salvador
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Slavs
Immigrants from El Salvador
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
46.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
177th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
21.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Immigrants from El Salvador Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,742,725 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.260 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,605,888 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.502 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 1.8%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slavic | Immigrants from El Salvador | 
| Minimum | 0.34% | 0.21% | 
| Maximum | 14.1% | 4.1% | 
| Range | 13.7% | 3.9% | 
| Mean | 2.9% | 1.9% | 
| Median | 2.3% | 2.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 1.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 2.3% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 0.86% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 0.70% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 0.69% | 
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Yugoslavian (2.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Oceania (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from North America (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Fiji (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Uruguayan (2.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170  | Average 2.2%  | 
| Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171  | Average 2.2%  | 
| Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172  | Average 2.2%  | 
| Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173  | Average 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174  | Average 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175  | Average 2.2%  | 
| Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176  | Average 2.2%  | 
| Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177  | Average 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178  | Average 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179  | Average 2.2%  | 
| Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180  | Average 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181  | Average 2.2%  | 
| Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182  | Average 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183  | Fair 2.2%  | 
| Moroccans | 35.4 /100 | #184  | Fair 2.2%  | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from El Salvador by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Czechoslovakian (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Ghanaian (2.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Thailand (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Grenada (2.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Slovak (2.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Europeans | 25.7 /100 | #192  | Fair 2.2%  | 
| British | 25.1 /100 | #193  | Fair 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194  | Fair 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195  | Fair 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196  | Fair 2.2%  | 
| Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197  | Fair 2.2%  | 
| Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198  | Fair 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199  | Fair 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200  | Fair 2.2%  | 
| Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201  | Poor 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202  | Poor 2.2%  | 
| Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203  | Poor 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204  | Poor 2.2%  | 
| Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205  | Poor 2.2%  | 
| Pennsylvania Germans | 14.5 /100 | #206  | Poor 2.2%  |