Immigrants from Turkey vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Turkey
Chippewa
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Turkey
Chippewa
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Turkey vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,019,564 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.507 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,009,829 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 29.8%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Turkey | Chippewa |
Minimum | 1.5% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 14.5% | 20.9% |
Range | 13.0% | 18.9% |
Mean | 5.4% | 9.1% |
Median | 4.8% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.4% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 3.7% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Turkey by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Immigrants from Venezuela (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Australia (5.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Pakistan (5.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.47%), and Afghan (5.5%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Spanish American (7.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from the Azores (7.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Iroquois (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (7.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and Cree (7.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |