Dominican vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Dominican
 Chippewa
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Dominicans
Chippewa
7.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dominican vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 354,945,896 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Dominicans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 7.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,009,829 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 1.6%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Dominican | Chippewa | 
| Minimum | 4.2% | 2.0% | 
| Maximum | 22.5% | 20.9% | 
| Range | 18.3% | 18.9% | 
| Mean | 7.9% | 9.1% | 
| Median | 7.1% | 8.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 6.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.1% | 11.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 4.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 3.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 3.7% | 
Demographics Similar to Dominicans and Chippewa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Dominicans are Ottawa (7.2%, a difference of 0.33%), Central American Indian (7.2%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (7.1%, a difference of 0.50%), Shoshone (7.1%, a difference of 0.74%), and Blackfeet (7.1%, a difference of 0.76%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Spanish American (7.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from the Azores (7.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Iroquois (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (7.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and Cree (7.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% | 
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% | 
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 7.2% | 
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 7.2% | 
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 7.2% | 
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 7.3% | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 7.4% | 
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 7.4% | 
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 7.4% |