Laotian vs Ugandan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Laotian
Ugandan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Laotians
Ugandans
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian vs Ugandan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,814,363 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,018,396 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 1.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Laotian | Ugandan |
| Minimum | 0.92% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 11.4% | 14.2% |
| Range | 10.4% | 12.8% |
| Mean | 6.6% | 5.7% |
| Median | 6.2% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.6% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Laotians and Ugandans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Switzerland (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (5.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Uganda (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (5.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Peruvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Eastern European (5.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Palestinian (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Chilean (5.7%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |