Iranian vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Iranian
Chippewa
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Iranians
Chippewa
5.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iranian vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,801,609 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iranians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,009,829 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 37.9%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iranian | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 19.5% | 20.9% |
| Range | 17.7% | 18.9% |
| Mean | 5.4% | 9.1% |
| Median | 4.7% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 3.7% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Iranians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.36%), Yup'ik (5.2%, a difference of 0.60%), Bolivian (5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from Bolivia (5.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and Immigrants from Korea (5.2%, a difference of 2.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Spanish American (7.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from the Azores (7.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Iroquois (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (7.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and Cree (7.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |