Guatemalan vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Guatemalan
 Chippewa
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Guatemalans
Chippewa
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
30.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
193rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,382,771 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.060 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,009,829 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 14.3%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guatemalan | Chippewa | 
| Minimum | 1.3% | 2.0% | 
| Maximum | 13.2% | 20.9% | 
| Range | 11.9% | 18.9% | 
| Mean | 6.4% | 9.1% | 
| Median | 6.2% | 8.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 6.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 11.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 4.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 3.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 3.7% | 
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Western Europe (6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% | 
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% | 
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% | 
| Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% | 
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% | 
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% | 
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% | 
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% | 
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% | 
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% | 
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% | 
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% | 
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% | 
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% | 
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% | 
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Spanish American (7.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from the Azores (7.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Iroquois (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (7.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and Cree (7.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% | 
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% | 
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% | 
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% | 
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% | 
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |