Laotian vs Immigrants from Belarus Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Laotian
 Immigrants from Belarus
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Laotians
Immigrants from Belarus
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
69.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian vs Immigrants from Belarus Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,814,363 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,188,321 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.130 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 7.1%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Laotian | Immigrants from Belarus | 
| Minimum | 0.92% | 0.54% | 
| Maximum | 11.4% | 19.6% | 
| Range | 10.4% | 19.0% | 
| Mean | 6.6% | 6.2% | 
| Median | 6.2% | 5.9% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 4.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.6% | 7.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 2.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 3.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 3.2% | 
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Laotians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Switzerland (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (5.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from France (5.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Uganda (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Sri Lankan (5.7%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57  | Exceptional 5.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58  | Exceptional 5.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59  | Exceptional 5.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60  | Exceptional 5.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61  | Exceptional 5.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62  | Exceptional 5.6%  | 
| Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63  | Exceptional 5.6%  | 
| Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Central American (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Latvia (6.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Nigerian (6.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168  | Good 6.1%  |