Immigrants from Korea vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Korea
Chippewa
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Korea
Chippewa
5.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Korea vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 416,118,040 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Korea and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,009,829 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 34.9%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Korea | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 24.1% | 20.9% |
| Range | 23.0% | 18.9% |
| Mean | 5.3% | 9.1% |
| Median | 4.6% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.2% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 3.7% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Korea by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Korea are Okinawan (5.3%, a difference of 0.31%), Burmese (5.3%, a difference of 0.81%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.96%), Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and Yup'ik (5.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Spanish American (7.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from the Azores (7.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Iroquois (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (7.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and Cree (7.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |