Iroquois vs Creek In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Iroquois
 Creek
 In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Iroquois
Creek
81.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
80.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Creek In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,240,076 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.512 and weighted average of 81.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,425,767 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Creek and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.326 and weighted average of 80.4%, a difference of 1.9%.
 
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois | Creek | 
| Minimum | 18.3% | 25.0% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 81.7% | 75.0% | 
| Mean | 78.4% | 76.2% | 
| Median | 82.8% | 78.2% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 70.7% | 70.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 91.2% | 83.1% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.5% | 12.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.8% | 13.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.6% | 13.6% | 
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Creek by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Chickasaw (81.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Mexican (81.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Alaskan Athabascan (81.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Cherokee (81.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from the Azores (81.5%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Sioux (80.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Pueblo (80.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Colville (80.7%, a difference of 0.41%), Houma (79.9%, a difference of 0.58%), and Seminole (80.8%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #311  | Tragic 81.9%  | 
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #312  | Tragic 81.9%  | 
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #313  | Tragic 81.9%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314  | Tragic 81.7%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #315  | Tragic 81.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #316  | Tragic 81.5%  | 
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317  | Tragic 81.5%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #318  | Tragic 81.4%  | 
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #319  | Tragic 81.4%  | 
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #320  | Tragic 81.4%  | 
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #321  | Tragic 81.3%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #322  | Tragic 81.2%  | 
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323  | Tragic 81.2%  | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #324  | Tragic 81.1%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325  | Tragic 81.0%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 80.8%  | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 80.7%  | 
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 80.4%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 80.4%  | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 80.0%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 79.9%  |