Immigrants from Ukraine vs Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ukraine
Chickasaw
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Ukraine
Chickasaw
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
18.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ukraine vs Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 289,659,329 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ukraine and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.915 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,679,473 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 28.8%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ukraine | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.5% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 88.9% | 29.7% |
Range | 87.4% | 28.2% |
Mean | 8.9% | 12.1% |
Median | 6.3% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.3% | 13.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.0% | 5.6% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ukraine by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ukraine are Immigrants from Congo (6.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Slovene (6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Finnish (6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Albanian (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Central America (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Yuman (7.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 1.7%), Cherokee (7.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.7% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 7.8% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |