Immigrants from Latvia vs New Zealander Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
 New Zealander
 Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
New Zealanders
11.4%
DISABILITY
90.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
DISABILITY
87.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs New Zealander Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,739,259 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,922,705 people shows no correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 0.45%.
 
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | New Zealander | 
| Minimum | 1.5% | 2.1% | 
| Maximum | 33.8% | 22.5% | 
| Range | 32.2% | 20.4% | 
| Mean | 12.9% | 12.1% | 
| Median | 11.9% | 11.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 9.2% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 15.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 6.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 4.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 4.8% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia and New Zealanders by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Italy (11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Europe (11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Macedonian (11.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Costa Rican (11.4%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Ghanaian (11.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Kenyan (11.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Russian (11.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (11.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and Ugandan (11.4%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability | 
| Brazilians | 93.3 /100 | #122  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| South Africans | 92.3 /100 | #123  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| South American Indians | 92.2 /100 | #124  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Costa Ricans | 91.9 /100 | #125  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 90.9 /100 | #126  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Italy | 90.4 /100 | #127  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Europe | 90.4 /100 | #128  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Macedonians | 90.3 /100 | #129  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Latvians | 89.8 /100 | #130  | Excellent 11.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Croatia | 89.8 /100 | #131  | Excellent 11.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Africa | 89.3 /100 | #132  | Excellent 11.4%  | 
| Arabs | 89.1 /100 | #133  | Excellent 11.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Guyana | 88.3 /100 | #134  | Excellent 11.4%  | 
| Ugandans | 87.9 /100 | #135  | Excellent 11.4%  | 
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 87.8 /100 | #136  | Excellent 11.4%  | 
| Kenyans | 87.1 /100 | #137  | Excellent 11.5%  | 
| New Zealanders | 87.0 /100 | #138  | Excellent 11.5%  | 
| Ghanaians | 87.0 /100 | #139  | Excellent 11.5%  | 
| Russians | 86.8 /100 | #140  | Excellent 11.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Grenada | 86.1 /100 | #141  | Excellent 11.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Sudan | 85.3 /100 | #142  | Excellent 11.5%  |