Korean vs Pima Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Korean
Pima
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Koreans
Pima
10.5%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
110th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Korean vs Pima Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,268,552 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Koreans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,540,994 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 54.1%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Korean | Pima |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 8.6% |
| Maximum | 25.7% | 44.5% |
| Range | 24.4% | 35.9% |
| Mean | 10.7% | 19.9% |
| Median | 9.6% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 25.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 8.2% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Koreans by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Koreans are Immigrants from Ethiopia (10.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Ethiopian (10.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Brazilian (10.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Zimbabwean (10.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.5%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 97.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 97.8 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Macedonians | 97.8 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 97.6 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Ethiopians | 97.4 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 97.2 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Koreans | 97.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Brazilians | 96.9 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 96.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Tongans | 96.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 96.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 95.9 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 95.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Chickasaw (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |