Ukrainian vs Pima Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Ukrainian
Pima
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Ukrainians
Pima
11.0%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
78.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ukrainian vs Pima Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,204,530 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ukrainians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.637 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,540,994 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 46.9%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ukrainian | Pima |
| Minimum | 4.3% | 8.6% |
| Maximum | 82.6% | 44.5% |
| Range | 78.4% | 35.9% |
| Mean | 17.5% | 19.9% |
| Median | 12.4% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.3% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.3% | 25.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.6% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.5% | 8.2% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Ukrainians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Ukrainians are Immigrants from England (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Canada (11.0%, a difference of 0.15%), New Zealander (11.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Moroccan (11.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (11.0%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 85.6 /100 | #145 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 83.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 83.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Arabs | 82.7 /100 | #148 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 81.1 /100 | #149 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Syrians | 79.8 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| New Zealanders | 79.3 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Ukrainians | 78.0 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 77.4 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
| Moroccans | 76.4 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 76.2 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
| Guyanese | 75.1 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | North America | 74.9 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
| Serbians | 73.6 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Chickasaw (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |