Egyptian vs Pima Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Egyptian
Pima
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Egyptians
Pima
9.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Egyptian vs Pima Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,747,097 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.023 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,540,994 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 66.5%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Egyptian | Pima |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 8.6% |
| Maximum | 20.3% | 44.5% |
| Range | 18.9% | 35.9% |
| Mean | 8.5% | 19.9% |
| Median | 8.3% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 25.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 8.2% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Egyptians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from Turkey (9.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cuba (9.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Belarus (9.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Bulgarian (9.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Armenia (9.7%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Israelis | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Chickasaw (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |