Colville vs Pima Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Colville
Pima
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Colville
Pima
15.8%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Colville vs Pima Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,682,629 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Colville and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004 and weighted average of 15.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,540,994 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 1.9%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Colville | Pima |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 8.6% |
| Maximum | 40.8% | 44.5% |
| Range | 37.9% | 35.9% |
| Mean | 21.7% | 19.9% |
| Median | 20.5% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.4% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.6% | 25.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.2% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 8.2% |
Demographics Similar to Colville and Pima by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Colville are Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Yuman (15.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 0.33%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 0.66%), and Alaskan Athabascan (15.7%, a difference of 0.75%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Chickasaw (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |