Nigerian vs Pima Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Nigerian
Pima
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Nigerians
Pima
11.6%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
16.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nigerian vs Pima Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 332,461,333 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nigerians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,540,994 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 38.6%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Nigerian | Pima |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 8.6% |
| Maximum | 27.1% | 44.5% |
| Range | 25.2% | 35.9% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 19.9% |
| Median | 11.2% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.0% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 25.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 8.2% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Nigerians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Nigerians are British (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Slavic (11.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Guatemala (11.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Kenya (11.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and Native Hawaiian (11.7%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 21.0 /100 | #197 | Fair 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 20.4 /100 | #198 | Fair 11.6% |
| Basques | 19.5 /100 | #199 | Poor 11.6% |
| Swiss | 18.7 /100 | #200 | Poor 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 17.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 17.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 11.6% |
| British | 17.0 /100 | #203 | Poor 11.6% |
| Nigerians | 16.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.6% |
| Slavs | 15.5 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 14.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.7% |
| Ghanaians | 14.8 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.7% |
| Guatemalans | 14.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 11.7% |
| Europeans | 13.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 11.7% |
| Belgians | 13.1 /100 | #210 | Poor 11.7% |
| Canadians | 13.0 /100 | #211 | Poor 11.7% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Chickasaw (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |