Soviet Union vs Sudanese Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Sudanese
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Soviet Union
Sudanese
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
72.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Sudanese Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,504,651 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.185 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,125,850 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.369 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.9%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Soviet Union | Sudanese |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.77% |
| Maximum | 6.1% | 6.7% |
| Range | 5.1% | 5.9% |
| Mean | 3.2% | 3.2% |
| Median | 3.0% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.9% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 0.92% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.0% | 0.97% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.0% | 0.96% |
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union and Sudanese by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Lithuania (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Palestinian (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |