Chickasaw vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Chickasaw
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,769,787 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.136 and weighted average of 2.5%, a difference of 79.4%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 0.42% |
| Maximum | 21.2% | 3.5% |
| Range | 18.8% | 3.1% |
| Mean | 7.4% | 2.2% |
| Median | 6.5% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 1.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 0.74% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 0.74% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Sierra Leonean (2.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (2.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Ecuadorian (2.5%, a difference of 0.54%), Barbadian (2.5%, a difference of 0.85%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (2.5%, a difference of 0.86%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Vietnamese | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| British West Indians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Barbadians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Dominicans | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Thais | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 2.5% |