Immigrants from Cambodia vs Sudanese Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cambodia
Sudanese
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Cambodia
Sudanese
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
64.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
72.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Sudanese Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,141,763 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.576 and weighted average of 3.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,125,850 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.369 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.82%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Cambodia | Sudanese |
Minimum | 1.4% | 0.77% |
Maximum | 15.8% | 6.7% |
Range | 14.4% | 5.9% |
Mean | 4.9% | 3.2% |
Median | 3.2% | 3.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.1% | 3.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 0.92% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 0.97% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 0.96% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cambodia and Sudanese by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cambodia are Immigrants from Central America (3.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (3.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Japan (2.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (3.0%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Lithuania (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Palestinian (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 57.9 /100 | #168 | Average 3.0% |