Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Jordan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Chickasaw
 Immigrants from Jordan
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Jordan
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Jordan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,270,296 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.229 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 55.4%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Jordan | 
| Minimum | 2.3% | 0.34% | 
| Maximum | 21.2% | 6.7% | 
| Range | 18.8% | 6.3% | 
| Mean | 7.4% | 2.9% | 
| Median | 6.5% | 2.9% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 2.4% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 3.4% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 0.92% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 0.99% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 0.98% | 
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 4.2%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 4.2%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 4.2%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 4.3%  | 
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 4.3%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 4.3%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 4.4%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 4.5%  | 
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 4.5%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 4.5%  | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 4.6%  | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 4.6%  | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 4.7%  | 
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343  | Tragic 4.7%  | 
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344  | Tragic 4.8%  | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147  | Good 2.9%  |