Arab vs Immigrants from Philippines Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Arab
Immigrants from Philippines
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Arabs
Immigrants from Philippines
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
91.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
83.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arab vs Immigrants from Philippines Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,612,258 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.255 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,065,462 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.164 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 1.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Arab | Immigrants from Philippines |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 17.8% | 20.8% |
| Range | 15.3% | 19.1% |
| Mean | 7.0% | 6.6% |
| Median | 6.2% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Arabs and Immigrants from Philippines by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Romanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |