Icelander vs Immigrants from Philippines Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Icelander
Immigrants from Philippines
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Icelanders
Immigrants from Philippines
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
83.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs Immigrants from Philippines Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,642,692 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.148 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,065,462 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.164 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 1.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Icelander | Immigrants from Philippines |
Minimum | 0.47% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 16.5% | 20.8% |
Range | 16.1% | 19.1% |
Mean | 6.9% | 6.6% |
Median | 5.6% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 7.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders and Immigrants from Philippines by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Arab (5.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Hungary (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |