Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Philippines Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Immigrants from Philippines
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Immigrants from Philippines
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
247th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
83.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Philippines Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,985,542 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,065,462 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.164 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 7.9%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Immigrants from Philippines |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 13.8% | 20.8% |
| Range | 11.4% | 19.1% |
| Mean | 6.4% | 6.6% |
| Median | 6.3% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 2.7% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Immigrants from Portugal (6.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Armenian (6.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Tlingit-Haida (6.5%, a difference of 0.070%), German (6.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Panama (6.5%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 1.6 /100 | #241 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Spaniards | 1.6 /100 | #242 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Germans | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Armenians | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Chinese | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Hawaiians | 0.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.8 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Scottish | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Belizeans | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Philippines by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Romanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |