Arab vs Icelander Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Arab
Icelander
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Arabs
Icelanders
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
91.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arab vs Icelander Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,612,258 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.255 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,642,692 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.148 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.20%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Arab | Icelander |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 0.47% |
| Maximum | 17.8% | 16.5% |
| Range | 15.3% | 16.1% |
| Mean | 7.0% | 6.9% |
| Median | 6.2% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Arabs and Icelanders by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |