Canadian vs Icelander Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Canadian
Icelander
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Canadians
Icelanders
15.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
82.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Canadian vs Icelander Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 426,709,261 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.655 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,122,044 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 1.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Canadian | Icelander |
| Minimum | 8.1% | 3.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 30.0% |
| Range | 91.9% | 26.2% |
| Mean | 33.6% | 15.0% |
| Median | 23.3% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.5% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.4% | 20.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 33.9% | 10.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 27.5% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.1% | 7.1% |
Demographics Similar to Canadians and Icelanders by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Immigrants from Jordan (15.6%, a difference of 0.020%), New Zealander (15.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Peru (15.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Armenian (15.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and Israeli (15.6%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Slavic (15.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Hungary (15.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Albania (15.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Samoan (15.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and Venezuelan (15.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
| South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
| New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
| Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
| Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |