Ute Female Disability
COMPARE
Ute
Select to Compare
Female Disability
Ute Female Disability
12.4%
DISABILITY | FEMALES
14.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,657,679 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.144 and weighted average of 12.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in percentage of females with a disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ute and percentage of females with a disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ute influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of females with a disability within an area, or if Ute simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of females with a disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ute by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Swiss (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Thailand (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Mexican (12.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and Panamanian (12.4%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Immigrants from Grenada | 20.5 /100 | #205 | Fair 12.4% |
Immigrants from Cuba | 20.2 /100 | #206 | Fair 12.4% |
Croatians | 20.2 /100 | #207 | Fair 12.4% |
Basques | 17.5 /100 | #208 | Poor 12.4% |
Mexicans | 15.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 12.4% |
Swiss | 14.9 /100 | #210 | Poor 12.4% |
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | 14.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 12.4% |
Ute | 14.7 /100 | #212 | Poor 12.4% |
Immigrants from Thailand | 14.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 12.4% |
Panamanians | 13.5 /100 | #214 | Poor 12.4% |
Samoans | 13.4 /100 | #215 | Poor 12.4% |
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | 13.3 /100 | #216 | Poor 12.4% |
British | 12.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 12.4% |
Immigrants from Bahamas | 12.5 /100 | #218 | Poor 12.4% |
Europeans | 12.1 /100 | #219 | Poor 12.4% |
Ute Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute Data | Female Disability Data |
Minimum | 0.028% | 7.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 35.7% |
Range | 100.0% | 28.7% |
Mean | 26.0% | 15.9% |
Median | 11.0% | 13.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 44.1% | 19.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 40.0% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 30.5% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 30.0% | 7.1% |
Correlation Details
Ute Percentile | Sample Size | Female Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.028% | 55,238,532 | 12.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 249,344 | 14.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 56,635 | 14.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 10,159 | 25.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 50,998 | 13.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75% | 8,458 | 13.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 387 | 7.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 2,004 | 14.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.86% | 8,830 | 11.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 1,151 | 25.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.71% | 14,894 | 12.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.81% | 470 | 19.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 1,754 | 10.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 1,285 | 13.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75% | 577 | 12.3% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.16% | 484 | 7.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 5,495 | 10.0% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.93% | 244 | 29.6% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.07% | 616 | 17.0% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.71% | 140 | 17.2% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.77% | 310 | 24.6% |
[ 42.0% - 42.5% ] 42.40% | 283 | 11.7% |
[ 44.0% - 44.5% ] 44.12% | 136 | 19.8% |
[ 52.0% - 52.5% ] 52.36% | 191 | 9.0% |
[ 56.5% - 57.0% ] 56.67% | 60 | 35.7% |
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.87% | 831 | 11.3% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.25% | 1,186 | 11.3% |
[ 78.0% - 78.5% ] 78.06% | 1,691 | 8.0% |
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.19% | 472 | 14.0% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 62 | 29.6% |