Lumbee Female Disability
COMPARE
Lumbee
Select to Compare
Female Disability
Lumbee Female Disability
15.8%
DISABILITY | FEMALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,288,474 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 15.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.14% in percentage of females with a disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Lumbee and percentage of females with a disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Lumbee influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of females with a disability within an area, or if Lumbee simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of females with a disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Kiowa (15.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Creek (15.7%, a difference of 0.68%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 2.3%), Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and Colville (15.1%, a difference of 4.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants from the Azores | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 16.9% |
Lumbee Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee Data | Female Disability Data |
| Minimum | 0.041% | 5.4% |
| Maximum | 84.9% | 41.7% |
| Range | 84.9% | 36.3% |
| Mean | 21.0% | 19.7% |
| Median | 11.2% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.2% | 22.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.7% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.6% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.3% | 7.6% |
Correlation Details
| Lumbee Percentile | Sample Size | Female Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.041% | 90,476,503 | 12.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 1,119,807 | 14.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 220,634 | 16.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 120,266 | 16.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 81,297 | 17.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 10,026 | 15.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.43% | 9,255 | 17.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 9,759 | 18.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.27% | 5,527 | 27.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 8,847 | 20.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.11% | 6,276 | 28.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.88% | 391 | 26.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.05% | 2,016 | 9.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 1,418 | 16.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 18,893 | 16.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.85% | 1,324 | 14.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.27% | 1,548 | 14.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 3,177 | 16.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.22% | 965 | 15.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.86% | 720 | 26.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.47% | 10,588 | 17.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.57% | 946 | 17.1% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.24% | 27,494 | 16.9% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.95% | 25,783 | 17.4% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.85% | 4,242 | 17.6% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.47% | 2,272 | 12.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.61% | 869 | 33.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.52% | 2,519 | 22.3% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.12% | 769 | 5.4% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.58% | 34,093 | 14.5% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.38% | 3,118 | 25.9% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.57% | 316 | 23.4% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.45% | 245 | 8.8% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.53% | 9,790 | 18.2% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.84% | 37 | 36.4% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.67% | 11,548 | 20.6% |
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.93% | 5,065 | 17.9% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.45% | 97 | 13.0% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.00% | 300 | 37.8% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.01% | 6,499 | 20.5% |
[ 55.5% - 56.0% ] 55.71% | 29,670 | 17.1% |
[ 62.0% - 62.5% ] 62.12% | 264 | 34.0% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.19% | 12,346 | 17.5% |
[ 81.5% - 82.0% ] 81.54% | 650 | 19.3% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.92% | 305 | 41.7% |