Immigrants from Middle Africa Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Select to Compare
Female Disability
Immigrants from Middle Africa Female Disability
12.1%
DISABILITY | FEMALES
72.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,716,278 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087 and weighted average of 12.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.086% in percentage of females with a disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of females with a disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Middle Africa influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of females with a disability within an area, or if Immigrants from Middle Africa simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of females with a disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Danish (12.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Moroccan (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Ghanaian (12.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Central America (12.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Syrian (12.1%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Icelanders | 80.7 /100 | #151 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants from Scotland | 79.3 /100 | #152 | Good 12.0% |
| Sudanese | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 12.0% |
| Syrians | 76.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
| Ghanaians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.1% |
| Moroccans | 72.9 /100 | #156 | Good 12.1% |
| Danes | 72.5 /100 | #157 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants from Middle Africa | 72.4 /100 | #158 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants from Central America | 67.7 /100 | #159 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants from Guatemala | 66.0 /100 | #160 | Good 12.1% |
| Guyanese | 64.7 /100 | #161 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants from Ukraine | 64.3 /100 | #162 | Good 12.1% |
| Guatemalans | 63.8 /100 | #163 | Good 12.1% |
| Czechs | 63.6 /100 | #164 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants from Oceania | 61.8 /100 | #165 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa Data | Female Disability Data |
| Minimum | 0.047% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 14.5% | 25.5% |
| Range | 14.5% | 22.6% |
| Mean | 3.8% | 12.2% |
| Median | 2.9% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.7% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 3.3% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Middle Africa Percentile | Sample Size | Female Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.047% | 132,030,236 | 12.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 33,303,901 | 12.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.32% | 15,102,587 | 12.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 7,465,987 | 11.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 4,578,123 | 12.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 2,671,285 | 12.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 1,572,364 | 11.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 958,264 | 11.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 945,229 | 11.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 887,680 | 11.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 621,204 | 11.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.45% | 280,786 | 14.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 227,605 | 13.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 296,843 | 13.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.86% | 294,753 | 10.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.98% | 178,803 | 11.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 122,311 | 12.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 153,287 | 12.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 199,553 | 11.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.50% | 127,033 | 11.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.60% | 12,365 | 12.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 9,486 | 12.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 105,607 | 9.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.02% | 49,856 | 13.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.17% | 21,011 | 11.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.21% | 3,648 | 10.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.40% | 43,554 | 11.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.54% | 125,905 | 12.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.69% | 2,330 | 17.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.79% | 12,128 | 16.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.17% | 69,634 | 11.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.27% | 76,357 | 11.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.46% | 28,427 | 10.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 17,634 | 12.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.75% | 27,909 | 11.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.89% | 26,684 | 10.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.66% | 21,985 | 8.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.67% | 2,699 | 17.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.84% | 14,443 | 9.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.92% | 3,104 | 15.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.99% | 15,489 | 6.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.96% | 4,809 | 6.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.47% | 1,997 | 2.9% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.89% | 143 | 25.5% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.52% | 1,240 | 18.2% |