Lumbee In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Lumbee
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Lumbee In Labor Force | Age 35-44
77.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,275,776 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.388 and weighted average of 77.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.23% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Lumbee and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Lumbee influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 within an area, or if Lumbee simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Hopi (77.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Yup'ik (77.3%, a difference of 0.35%), Pueblo (77.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Crow (76.5%, a difference of 0.69%), and Immigrants from Yemen (76.3%, a difference of 0.93%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 78.9% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 78.1% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 77.9% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 77.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 77.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 77.0% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 77.0% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 76.5% |
Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 76.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 74.8% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 74.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 74.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |
Lumbee In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lumbee Data | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Data |
Minimum | 0.041% | 41.3% |
Maximum | 84.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 84.9% | 58.7% |
Mean | 22.3% | 75.7% |
Median | 11.2% | 75.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 67.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 38.3% | 82.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 32.8% | 14.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.2% | 14.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.0% | 13.9% |
Correlation Details
Lumbee Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.041% | 90,462,751 | 83.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 1,119,807 | 82.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 220,793 | 79.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 120,266 | 77.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 81,868 | 75.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 10,026 | 80.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.43% | 9,255 | 68.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 9,759 | 75.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.27% | 5,527 | 82.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 8,847 | 74.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.11% | 6,276 | 75.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.88% | 391 | 48.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.05% | 2,016 | 56.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 1,418 | 65.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 18,893 | 78.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.83% | 1,417 | 52.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.27% | 1,548 | 90.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 3,177 | 85.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.22% | 965 | 69.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.82% | 906 | 81.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.47% | 10,588 | 73.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.57% | 946 | 78.3% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.24% | 27,494 | 69.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.95% | 25,783 | 63.7% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.84% | 4,385 | 56.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.47% | 2,272 | 76.2% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.61% | 869 | 41.3% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.52% | 2,519 | 81.2% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.12% | 769 | 66.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.58% | 34,093 | 71.7% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.38% | 3,118 | 61.2% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.57% | 316 | 100.0% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.53% | 9,790 | 62.4% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.84% | 37 | 100.0% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.67% | 11,548 | 57.2% |
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.93% | 5,065 | 73.5% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.45% | 97 | 100.0% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.00% | 300 | 87.7% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.01% | 6,499 | 80.7% |
[ 55.5% - 56.0% ] 55.71% | 29,670 | 73.7% |
[ 62.0% - 62.5% ] 62.12% | 264 | 100.0% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.19% | 12,346 | 75.3% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.59% | 147 | 100.0% |
[ 81.5% - 82.0% ] 81.54% | 650 | 100.0% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.92% | 305 | 73.4% |