Tlingit-Haida vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Immigrants from Oceania
4.9%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
79.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,741,997 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,351,716 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.803 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 4.3%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 1.8% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 43.5% | 29.1% |
Range | 41.7% | 27.9% |
Mean | 8.6% | 7.9% |
Median | 5.5% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.5% | 8.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 5.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Hungarian (4.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Cuban (4.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ireland (4.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from North America (4.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Osage (4.9%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Immigrants | Canada | 98.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 98.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Celtics | 98.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Hungarians | 98.3 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Cubans | 98.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Tlingit-Haida | 98.3 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Osage | 98.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 4.9% |
German Russians | 98.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.0 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Russians | 98.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.0 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 98.0 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |