Immigrants from India vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from India
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from India
Immigrants from Oceania
4.7%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
79.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from India vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 431,990,164 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,351,716 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.803 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 9.0%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from India | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 9.1% | 29.1% |
| Range | 8.1% | 27.9% |
| Mean | 4.7% | 7.9% |
| Median | 4.5% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.2% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 5.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from India by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from India are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Welsh (4.7%, a difference of 0.090%), British (4.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Irish (4.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and Cypriot (4.7%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Poles | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Scottish | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Welsh | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | India | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| British | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Irish | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Sudanese | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Slovaks | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
| Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
| Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |