Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Central American Indians
Immigrants from Oceania
6.3%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
79.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,404,232 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.238 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,351,716 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.803 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 22.2%.

Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American Indian | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 0.80% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 30.4% | 29.1% |
Range | 29.6% | 27.9% |
Mean | 8.3% | 7.9% |
Median | 6.9% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 8.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 5.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Ecuadorian (6.3%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Grenada (6.3%, a difference of 0.79%), Belizean (6.3%, a difference of 0.81%), and Hispanic or Latino (6.2%, a difference of 0.99%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 6.2% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 6.2% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 6.2% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 6.2% |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 6.3% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 6.3% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 6.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 6.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 6.4% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |