Slavic vs Czechoslovakian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Slavic
Czechoslovakian
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Slavs
Czechoslovakians
9.8%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Czechoslovakian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,346,307 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.147 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,521,017 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 3.2%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Slavic | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 0.12% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 40.6% | 44.2% |
Range | 40.4% | 43.1% |
Mean | 11.9% | 11.8% |
Median | 9.2% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 7.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.0% | 14.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs and Czechoslovakians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Filipino (9.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Carpatho Rusyn (9.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Hungarian (9.7%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (9.7%, a difference of 0.83%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Latvian (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), British (9.4%, a difference of 0.43%), Scotch-Irish (9.5%, a difference of 0.50%), Belgian (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and Greek (9.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
British | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Belgians | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.6 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Austrians | 99.5 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Estonians | 99.5 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.5 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 9.7% |
French | 99.5 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.4 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Hungarians | 99.4 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 99.3 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Filipinos | 99.3 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Slavs | 99.2 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.2 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 9.8% |