Danish vs Osage Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Danish
Osage
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Danes
Osage
13.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
5.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish vs Osage Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 461,554,581 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.510 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,574,378 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 17.7%, a difference of 30.1%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Danish | Osage |
| Minimum | 4.1% | 7.4% |
| Maximum | 51.2% | 54.5% |
| Range | 47.0% | 47.2% |
| Mean | 19.3% | 23.2% |
| Median | 14.1% | 19.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.8% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.6% | 31.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.8% | 18.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.4% | 12.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.3% | 12.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Danes by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from China (13.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Turkish (13.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Swedish (13.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and Cypriot (13.6%, a difference of 0.45%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Asians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Cypriots | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Turks | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Danes | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.6 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Demographics Similar to Osage by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Panamanian (17.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (17.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Moroccan (17.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Japanese (17.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and Iraqi (17.7%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Malaysians | 7.6 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 7.3 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 6.8 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 6.7 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Aleuts | 6.6 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Panamanians | 5.9 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Osage | 5.8 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Moroccans | 5.6 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Japanese | 5.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Iraqis | 5.5 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 5.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 5.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.3 /100 | #221 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 3.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 17.9% |