Ugandan vs Immigrants from Guyana Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ugandan
Immigrants from Guyana
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Ugandans
Immigrants from Guyana
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
64.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
50.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
173rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Guyana Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,803,349 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 20.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,103,781 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guyana and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 21.0%, a difference of 0.86%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ugandan | Immigrants from Guyana |
Minimum | 5.5% | 0.34% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 52.6% |
Range | 94.5% | 52.3% |
Mean | 23.7% | 19.9% |
Median | 20.0% | 19.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.9% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.0% | 23.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.5% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.2% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Immigrants from Guyana by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guyana are Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.14%), New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |