New Zealander vs Immigrants from Guyana Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
New Zealander
Immigrants from Guyana
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
New Zealanders
Immigrants from Guyana
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
53.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
170th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
50.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
173rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Immigrants from Guyana Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,229,490 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.505 and weighted average of 21.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,103,781 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guyana and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 21.0%, a difference of 0.16%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | New Zealander | Immigrants from Guyana |
Minimum | 3.9% | 0.34% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 52.6% |
Range | 96.1% | 52.3% |
Mean | 27.1% | 19.9% |
Median | 21.3% | 19.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.9% | 23.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.0% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.0% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.7% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders and Immigrants from Guyana by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guyana are Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Canadian (21.1%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |