Moroccan vs Immigrants from Guyana Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Moroccan
Immigrants from Guyana
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Moroccans
Immigrants from Guyana
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
52.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
50.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
173rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Moroccan vs Immigrants from Guyana Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,405,308 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 21.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,103,781 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guyana and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 21.0%, a difference of 0.14%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Moroccan | Immigrants from Guyana |
| Minimum | 10.5% | 0.34% |
| Maximum | 53.5% | 52.6% |
| Range | 43.0% | 52.3% |
| Mean | 24.5% | 19.9% |
| Median | 20.6% | 19.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.0% | 14.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.3% | 23.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.4% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.1% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Moroccans and Immigrants from Guyana by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guyana are Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.090%), New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Canadian (21.1%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
| Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |