Ugandan vs Immigrants from Western Europe Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ugandan
Immigrants from Western Europe
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Ugandans
Immigrants from Western Europe
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
64.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
76.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Western Europe Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,803,349 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 20.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,241,585 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Europe and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.616 and weighted average of 20.6%, a difference of 0.98%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ugandan | Immigrants from Western Europe |
Minimum | 5.5% | 16.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 94.5% | 83.8% |
Mean | 23.7% | 44.3% |
Median | 20.0% | 31.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.9% | 21.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.0% | 59.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 37.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.5% | 28.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.2% | 28.2% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Immigrants from Western Europe by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Europe are Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.080%), South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |