Norwegian vs Immigrants from Guyana Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Norwegian
Immigrants from Guyana
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Norwegians
Immigrants from Guyana
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
63.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
50.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
173rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Immigrants from Guyana Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 516,441,916 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.317 and weighted average of 20.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,103,781 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guyana and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 21.0%, a difference of 0.80%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Norwegian | Immigrants from Guyana |
Minimum | 3.6% | 0.34% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 52.6% |
Range | 46.4% | 52.3% |
Mean | 24.8% | 19.9% |
Median | 23.2% | 19.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.1% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.1% | 23.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Norwegians and Immigrants from Guyana by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Ugandan (20.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guyana are Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.14%), New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |