Costa Rican vs Malaysian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Malaysian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Malaysians
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
29.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
193rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Malaysian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,586,429 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,983,530 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 4.0%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | Malaysian |
| Minimum | 0.54% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 27.6% | 17.9% |
| Range | 27.0% | 16.4% |
| Mean | 6.0% | 6.9% |
| Median | 5.0% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Paraguayan (5.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Hawaiian (5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Sierra Leonean (5.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.65%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
| Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
| Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
| Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
| Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
| Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 5.2% |
| Bermudans | 52.9 /100 | #171 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 51.3 /100 | #172 | Average 5.2% |
| Alsatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Cape Verdean (5.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (5.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from the Azores (5.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and Ugandan (5.3%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Hungarians | 34.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 33.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 5.3% |
| Israelis | 33.1 /100 | #188 | Fair 5.3% |
| South American Indians | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 5.3% |
| Ugandans | 31.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 30.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 5.3% |
| Cape Verdeans | 30.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 5.3% |
| Malaysians | 29.5 /100 | #193 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 27.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 27.5 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.4% |
| Spaniards | 27.4 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.4% |
| Liberians | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
| Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |