Immigrants from Belgium vs Bhutanese Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belgium
Bhutanese
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Immigrants from Belgium
Bhutanese
9.6%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.2%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belgium vs Bhutanese Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,482,821 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,770,052 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 9.2%, a difference of 4.3%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Belgium | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 27.1% | 32.4% |
| Range | 26.0% | 31.4% |
| Mean | 9.3% | 10.2% |
| Median | 8.0% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.4% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belgium and Bhutanese by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belgium are Immigrants from Denmark (9.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Australian (9.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Croatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from China (9.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and Cambodian (9.5%, a difference of 0.81%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Czech (9.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swedish (9.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Sweden (9.3%, a difference of 0.66%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (9.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Turks | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Cambodians | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Australians | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 9.6% |