Turkish vs Bhutanese Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Turkish
Bhutanese
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Turks
Bhutanese
10.0%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.3%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Bhutanese Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,163,307 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.216 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,130,109 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139 and weighted average of 9.3%, a difference of 7.1%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 3.5% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 20.6% | 75.4% |
Range | 17.1% | 73.9% |
Mean | 8.8% | 9.4% |
Median | 8.5% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.5% | 10.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 8.0% |
Similar Demographics by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Demographics Similar to Turks by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Russian (10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (10.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Yugoslavian (10.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Samoan (10.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Canadians | 98.5 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Australians | 98.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Samoans | 98.0 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Yugoslavians | 97.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Palestinians | 97.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Russians | 97.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Turks | 97.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.8 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.0% |
New Zealanders | 97.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 97.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Whites/Caucasians | 97.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 97.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Koreans | 97.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.3 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Menominee (9.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Tongan (9.3%, a difference of 0.32%), Finnish (9.4%, a difference of 0.37%), Italian (9.3%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Scotland (9.3%, a difference of 0.60%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Welsh | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Irish | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Italians | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Menominee | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Finns | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Native Hawaiians | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.4% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |