Immigrants from Japan vs Bhutanese Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Immigrants from Japan
Bhutanese
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Immigrants from Japan
Bhutanese
9.0%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.2%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Japan vs Bhutanese Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 339,298,803 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.022 and weighted average of 9.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,770,052 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 9.2%, a difference of 2.6%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Japan | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 48.9% | 32.4% |
Range | 47.9% | 31.4% |
Mean | 9.0% | 10.2% |
Median | 5.9% | 8.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.8% | 12.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Japan and Bhutanese by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Immigrants from Scotland (9.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Norwegian (9.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Danish (9.0%, a difference of 0.61%), Maltese (8.9%, a difference of 0.93%), and Bulgarian (8.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Czech (9.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swedish (9.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Ireland (9.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.2%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.3% |